Specter, Casey announce completion of rail study, I-81 project funding


Font size: [A] [A] [A]

PITTSTON TWP. - U.S. Sens. Arlen Specter and Bob Casey announced Monday nearly $12.9 million for resurfacing stretches of Interstate 81 and the completion of the environmental impact study on the Scranton/New York City rail line that will make the project eligible for federal funding.

The funds from the economic stimulus package passed this year will pay for paving work on about five miles of I-81 near Hazleton and the roughly 10 miles from Nanticoke to the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton International Airport.

George Roberts, district executive with the state Department of Transportation, said the project is slated to start in August and could potentially wrap up before winter.

The senators said I-81 and the rail line could receive cash in the federal transportation funding effort scheduled to take shape this year and direct ground transportation spending for the next six years.

PennDOT is working on the preliminary engineering assessment on widening the interstate between Davis Street and the Central Scranton Expressway exits. Those five miles' worth of widening are expected to cost more than $115 million, Mr. Roberts said.

The rail line is longer and pricier.

The 88-mile route from Scranton to Port Morris, N.J., where the line would link with the existing passenger rail system, comes with a price tag of about $550 million.

The 60-mile right of way from Scranton to the Pennsylvania-New Jersey border already holds one line that hosts freight trains, but it will have to be upgraded with more ties to accommodate higher speeds - 40 mph for freight and 60 mph for passenger trains.

Pennsylvania Northeast Regional Railroad Authority President Larry Malski said design work on the rail line could begin once it is granted funding, and after a 30-day public comment period on the environmental study expires.

In his best-case scenario, the effort that has spanned decades could see trains on tracks in four to five years.

"This is a major hurdle that's been cleared," Mr. Malski said.

Supporters of the project say the rail line will make commuting to New York easier, make the region more of a tourist destination and strengthen the region's role as a shipping and logistics hub.

"This is really about commerce and jobs and opportunity in the future," Mr. Casey said.

Contact the writer: nsohr@citizensvoice.com







28 posted comments

How does repaving I-81 create the type of long lasting jobs, high paying jobs that the stimulus bill money is supposed to create?
Bob 06/09/09 06:30
It took the DL&W Railroad just over two yars to build the Cutoff, from scratch.

Much of the existing infrastructure is present, and the right-of-way for the roadbed is already present, settled, and levelled.

Why are we still waiting to retrack this existing route?

Of course, the whole point would be moot if Conrail didn't rip up the original tracks in violation of a court-ordered injunction.

Bill G 06/09/09 03:55
Mike...$550 Million USD for rail service to Scranton. Please explain how it will be beneficial to all. I love rail and use it all the time between Boston and DC and points in between. By the time this project would come to fruition, the cost will be 3X what they tell you and then wouldn't include the operating cost. If there is enough business in NEPA to support the cost, go for it.
Dont Wasteit 06/09/09 03:11
Dont Wasteit,

In response to your post, please refer to my post at 1238 yesterday for answers to your first two questions. This arguement is buttressed by the number of Martz buses and cars that leave from Scranton, Mount Pocono and East Stroudsburg every morning. In response to your last statement "Stop wasting federal money." What is more wasteful, spending money annually maintaining the road infrastructure or less on railroad infrastructure, especially given the focus on conserving or eliminating fossil fuels (fuels that are also responsible for cancer and other health/environmental issues which taxpayers pay for in health care money for the uninsured, lost crops due to changes in climatic patterns, etc.) In response to the last part of your statement "on wasteful things or make sure the city and county pay at least 1/2." Why should the city or county pay half for this when this is:
1. A move that would be universally benificial to all,
even citizens that don't live in Scranton or commute because of direct and indirect benifits.
2. This is an "Interstate" project. The Federal goverment is responsible for projects that occur between two states, even if that isn't always the practice. Case in point: When the Interstate Highway system was developed, the federal goverment built the roads, the states were in charge of maintenance, but the states still received some federal funding each year to perform work. I would expect a similar agreement to be in place for this rail project also.

Mike 06/09/09 01:31
You can tell the people who live in the lifetime Scranton bubble and those who don't it's very interesting.
Wow 06/09/09 11:46
Reality check....do you really need rail service to NYC? What could possibly justify this expense when the city has so many other needs. Stop wasting federal money on wasteful things or make sure the city and county pay at least 1/2.
Dont Wasteit 06/09/09 11:08
Something is rotten in Denmark. I went on the New Jersey Transit webpage and the Federal Transit webpage and not a word about completion of any study that would have any impact on rail project. Malski tootin' horn a little early?
Paul H. 06/09/09 09:09
By car, it's only about an hour and a half to NYC. As such, for this to work and be meaningful, it has to be a fast, efficient rail service - not just some pokey tourist ride in to NYC. And instead of stopping at every little hamlet, village and town along the way, the stations should only be at very selective intervals - many of the locales further in to NYC already have good rail access in. If it ends up being several hours' travel, many people will not look upon it as a worthwhile option. But if it's fast and effective, it opens up dynamic New York markets for NEPA workers, businesses and more.

With regard to I-81, PennDOT did a study a few years back to consider widening key sections of it to 3 lanes to reduce the congestion often seen - now is the time to consider moving forward with it, as the funds are available. If not now, then likely never.

J C 06/08/09 08:45
Correction, Rusty, NEPA is full of NIMBY anti-progressive whiners, not "thinkers." I'm now beginning to think that my decision to relocate to a more forward-thinking area was one of the best choices I've ever made. People in Scranton/Wilkes-Barre don't want commuter rail access to NYC because they're afraid of what they don't understand---hence also the rampant presence of homophobia and racism in much of the area. People only think of CRIME when they think of NYC, but Wilkes-Barre, per capita has a MUCH higher violent crime rate so far in 2009 than NYC (and I did some analysis on another message board to substantiate that as well). The crime is already here. I can't picture a high-speed commuter train filled with pimps, drug dealers, and serial killers. I CAN picture a commuter train filled with the more forward-thinking people of Scranton going on weekend trips to see the Yankees play, take in a Broadway show, explore Brooklyn Heights, see the Empire State Building, visit relatives in Northern NJ, etc. "Brain drain?" Gee. I wonder why? The more and more I read the comments in many of these threads the more and more apparent that the intellectual capacity continues to dwindle back in NEPA.
SWB 06/08/09 07:23
DonPaschal is right. It's called deobligation of funds for lack of progress. But they didn't take anything off the rail project I don't think and that's been dinner conversation for 20 years. The bus station only about 10 I think. But it could happen yes. We live in an area populated with talkers not doers.
Rusty 06/08/09 04:29
Here's another reason the Times should investigate the lack of progress on the intermodel system. Federal monies were secured for this project and given the economic problems we are facing in this country what if..........just WHAT IF the Federal government decides to TAKE BACK the money secured by Congressman Kanjorski because of our lack of action on this project. This is a story just waiting to happen Scranton Times!
DonPaschal 06/08/09 04:01
I heard this line will be for garbage to Dunmore. Already planning a transfer point down in New Jersey. Buying cars in fact some are stored around the area, for the garbage. I hear 2 or 3, 60 car trains a week. That's a lot of trucks off the road. That's a good idea.
Dom 06/08/09 03:49
I am willing to bet that we see neither a terminal or a train in 10 years. Too many bozos trying to toot the horn instead of rolling up sleeves and getting the job done. I'm told the guy at the railroad is as dumb as a box of rocks and Colts doesn't have anyone to move this project along. All new staff came in with Washko's people.
Mario 06/08/09 03:31
A guy I know works in the office at Colts and he said they can't connect the dots with the State and Martz. State owns the land, but Martz will give them their land but it just keeps going in circles he said. He doesn't think it will happen. But with the speed the train is coming maybe if it takes 5-10 more years it will hook up just in time.
Ronnie 06/08/09 02:49
Mike nailed that right on the head, great job!! There was a letter to the editor a few weeks back asking about the progress of the intermodel station, the Times should do an investigation, that Martz terminal building is a disgrace. And for all the naysayers of this rail line, wake up, this will do wonders for this area. You would still complain even if nothing was being built or started in this area and that businesses where shutting down and moving to a more "modernized" city. This is the answer to alot of the problems this area has.
Railman 06/08/09 02:31
Besides the possitive economical impact on the underpriced realestate market in Scranton and Binghamtom and other small cities likely to be effected by the rail to NY, this whole project is especialy viable as an alternative commute in regards to future gas prices.
The transportation hub in this region in both rail and Interstates adds to it being a major player for job growth in lieu of the lower wage demand due to the lower cost of living in the area.
adrian del valle 06/08/09 02:16
Right on railman with your comment on the intermodel station for Scranton. Something has gone awry with that project and I wish the Scranton Times would investigate. The Wilke-Barre and Hazleton projects are well under way and Scranton continues to flounder.
DonPaschal 06/08/09 01:23
Train/bus station is scheduled for completion when pigs fly which will be in conjunction with the arrival of the first train.
Wally 06/08/09 12:50
Despite the fact that the local Scranton politicians don't know what "Brain Drain" is, a rail connection to NYC would help slow it down. Good transportation alternatives are necessary not only for this areas growth but for its survival.
HappytoLivehere 06/08/09 12:46
Train/bus station is scheduled for completion when pigs fly which will be in conjunction with the arrival of the first train.
Wally 06/08/09 12:44
Half Off Nepa

1/2 OFF NEPA

Today's Feature: Steve Pronko Diamond and Fine Jewelry - Card Value: $50 Sale Price: $25. - Earning Your Trust Since 1928!

Home for the Holidays Contest

Answer the trivia questions for your chance to win 4 tickets to the NEPA Philharmonic's "Home for the Holidays" concert.

Manhunt ends in West Scranton

A chaotic manhunt through West Scranton that started with state police firing shots at a suspect ended Friday night with the apprehension of a wanted man who two days earlier allegedly led authorities on a high-speed chase through the Midvalley. Derek


 

Manhunt ends in West Scranton

A chaotic manhunt through West Scranton that started with state police firing shots at a suspect ended Friday night with the apprehension of a wanted man who two days earlier allegedly led authorities on a high-speed chase through the Midvalley. Derek