House bill would ban texting while driving


Font size: [A] [A] [A]

HARRISBURG - Drivers will face fines if they are caught texting while driving under legislation introduced Monday that attempts to make highways safer.

The House measure to deter distracted driving takes special aim at younger drivers ages 16 to 18 who have learner's permits or junior licenses. Not only would they be subject to the texting ban, they would be barred from using cell phones or other wireless devices such as mobile computers or personal digital assistants while driving as well. Drivers older than 18 wouldn't be subject to this wireless ban.

This legislation is being given priority in the House and enjoys bipartisan support from caucus leaders and the Pennsylvania AAA Federation. House Majority Leader Todd Eachus, D-116, Hazleton, is a co-sponsor.

Lawmakers relayed accounts of constituents killed or seriously injured in traffic accidents caused by drivers distracted because they were busy texting electronic messages and not paying attention to highway conditions.

"We are all one text away from eternity," said House Transportation Committee Chairman Joseph Markosek, D-25, Monroeville, at a Capitol news conference.

The transportation committee could vote on the bill as early as today. Two panel members from Northeast Pennsylvania, Reps. Mike Carroll, D-118, Hughestown, and John Siptroth, D-189, Smithfield Twp., said they will vote for the bill.

The bill would make texting while driving and the cell phone use ban for younger drivers a primary offense, meaning a police officer could stop a vehicle if the motorist is observed using these devices while driving.

Violators would face a $50 fine that would double to $100 if the offense occurs in a school zone or active highway work zone, but there would be no points assessed to a driver's license. Insurance companies could not increase premiums for motorists convicted of this offense.

The bill makes exceptions for drivers who text to contact 911 emergency services. A driver could legally text if their vehicle is stopped due to a traffic obstruction and the transmission is in neutral or park.

If this legislation is enacted, it would preempt any local ordinances addressing texting bans. Philadelphia has already enacted a ban on texting while driving and several other cities are considering action.

Bill sponsors said it will be easier for drivers to obey one state law rather than dozens of local ordinances.

Under the bill, PennDOT will require that vehicle accident report forms include information on whether a driver was using a wireless communications device. Eighteen states have already enacted texting while driving bans and Congress is considering legislation that would withhold a portion of federal transportation dollars from states that don't have bans.

Contact the writer: rswift@timesshamrock.com







36 posted comments

Unless this law covers everyone, it is ridiculous.
Carl Homish 11/11/09 04:02
"Hand-free devices are just as bad. It isn't the aspect of having something in your hand, it's the aspect of your attention being focused on talking, and the topics over the phone."

BS.

If that were true, we should also ban radios in cars and make it illegal for any passenger to carry on a conversation with the driver.

The problem with handheld devices is that the driver's eyes are off the road for extended periods. Hands free devices eliminate that problem.

Reader 11/10/09 06:54
Goofy typewriter phones, doesn't anyone talk on channel 10 anymore?
Break 10 Break 11/10/09 05:34
It is incredibly stupid that such a law would not apply to everyone. It is just another example of lousy legislation and legislators. The country is a mess. Get them ALL out of office.

Oh, and I hope that 'multi tasker' was kidding. Sadly he/she probably wasn't. Let's hope when he/she causes the inevitable unexplained 'lost control' accident, no one else is injured or killed. EVERY accident now should require a phone records check like the person who was ticketed in NJ described below. Insurance and driver's license should be penalized appropriately.

J. Webb 11/10/09 04:23
According to what I just read think about it, the texting ban IS for everybody. It's cell phone use that isn't permitted for 18 and under.
Sandy 11/10/09 03:23
It doesn't matter because this law is just another one that won't be enforced. I see cops drive right past people with their headlights off in work zones, I see them drive right past people with their headlights off when their wipers are on, and I see cops do nothing about people that are in the left lane on the highway and not passing. We have laws for these, but the cops don't enforce them. They won't enforce the texting ban either.
useless 11/10/09 02:42
BAN THE SOCCOR MOMS ! (=
(= 11/10/09 02:33
I think the ban should be for everyone. It is a distraction for all people, age does not matter. When you are driving that is all you should be doing is driving.
Linda 11/10/09 02:23
i think if you are going to do it for everyone that means cops can't be on there either they are the worst
becky 11/10/09 01:45
I teach college students, and they are absolutely addicted to texting -- they do it while walking around campus, in the cafeteria, and in class. This ban should apply to everyone. (19 year olds are no more able to drive and text than 16 year olds or 70 year olds!)
Allison 11/10/09 12:40
This law should be for ALL drivers, not just the young. Why not pass it for ALL?
think about it 11/10/09 12:30
Because drivers over age 18 don't get into accidents because of texting or otherwise?
huh 11/10/09 12:21
I agree with the ban but why only 16 - 18 yr olds? They are not the only ones who talk/txt and drive. Adults are just as guilty of distracted driving as teenagers. What is a teenager going to think when they can't use their phone while driving but their guardian can? This should apply to everyone.
Michelle 11/10/09 12:14
"This is a fairly simple law but some how our law makers have cluttered it up, first off the driver of a car should not be using a cell phone for talk or text unless on a hands free device, No ifs no ands no buts"

Hand-free devices are just as bad. It isn't the aspect of having something in your hand, it's the aspect of your attention being focused on talking, and the topics over the phone. Hand-free devices are just as bad, and I think should also be banned if this is the route we are taking. Some vehicles also have the phone wired into the consol so you can talk hands-free while driving. I think while we're at it, this should be banned from all vehicles.

J.Daniels 11/10/09 10:53
helmet laws & texting are 2 totally different things. Lack of a helmet will not in & of itself cause an accident. don't even get me started on the decreased field of vision with a helmet on. if I get in an accident while not wearing a helmet that's my problem. If it's caused by you cause you were texting that's where it becomes your problem. Don't try to protect me from myself unless you're willing to completely ban any activity that may get someone hurt. Skiing, smoking ANYWHERE, bungee jumping, & crossing the street spring to mind.
Tom 11/10/09 10:13
I once saw someone texting while riding a motorcycle.
John 11/10/09 10:06
I agree with the people on here who don't support this particular wording of the bill. p makes a great point about the logistics of enforcement when the bill is targeting the 16-18 crowd. While I'll grant that people in that age group are worse drivers (the numbers bear that out), I would make the analogy with drunk drivers. A drunk 40 year old is just as much a hazard on the road as a drunk 16 year old. The bill should be rewritten to expand the ban on phones and PDA's to all drivers. Just because those in the 16-18 group are those who predominately text while driving doesn;t mean others don't do it and aren't just as dangerous on the road. By the way, I just have to say that anyone who thinks they can text or check their email while driving probably isn't a good driver even when they don't have a nose in their cell phone.
Hildebrand 11/10/09 09:40
Are you an idiot MT, You should not drive a big wheel! As far as kids doing the texing, many adults have this afliction also. Motorcycles and seatbelts...get a life. Good idea, allow the public to take care of this.
Duh 11/10/09 09:26
Why is this being limited to 16 to 18 year olds. I've seen ADULTS who are just as bad (if not worse) texting/talking/using other wireless devices as well. This law should apply to ALL DRIVERS.
how dumb can you be 11/10/09 09:21
Sounds like multi-tasker is an extremely dangerous driver and should not be operating a vehicle! I am concerned.
wow 11/10/09 09:01
Half Off Nepa

1/2 OFF NEPA

Today's Feature: Steve Pronko Diamond and Fine Jewelry - Card Value: $50 Sale Price: $25. - Earning Your Trust Since 1928!

Home for the Holidays Contest

Answer the trivia questions for your chance to win 4 tickets to the NEPA Philharmonic's "Home for the Holidays" concert.