Health department confirms swine flu case in Lackawanna County


Font size: [A] [A] [A]

The first case of swine flu in Lackawanna County was confirmed Tuesday by the state Department of Health.

Tests performed at a state laboratory revealed the probable case of the H1N1 virus reported Monday is a genuine incidence of the flu, spokeswoman Stacy Kriedeman said.

The Health Department will not reveal any information about the patient, including residence or the health care provider that reported the incident, she said.

Spokesmen for Community Medical Center and Mercy Hospital said Monday neither hospital has submitted samples to the state or the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A Moses Taylor Hospital spokeswoman said Monday it is hospital policy not to comment on whether it has forwarded samples.

There are now 58 confirmed and three probable cases of the flu in Pennsylvania, the Health Department said Tuesday.

Ms. Kriedeman said local and state agencies treat probable cases of the H1N1 virus as if they were confirmed, so Tuesday's announcement of the confirmed Lackawan-na County case will not trigger a new response. She said people should stay vigilant about taking precautions like washing hands, covering coughs and staying home from work or school when ill.

"They are small things you can do, but they really do have a big impact on preventing the spread of disease," she said.

Contact the writer: llegere@timesshamrock.com







12 posted comments

OK so it is now in Lackawanna County... hmmmm not liking this at all but hey, look how many people die every year from the regular seasonal flu we are so accustom to.
I understand the whole PHI issue, but they could say the area in Lackawanna that is affected to lower the risk of spreading.
It could make folks a little more vigilant about seeing their MD.

we are all freaking out about swine flu, but why don't we do it for the "seasonal flu" or cancer? They both kill thousands every year.

ladywitch 05/20/2009 22:09
PROTECT THE INDIVIDUAL IDENTITY-DISCLOSE AREA. ETHICALLY, THE PUBLIC GOOD SHOULD TRUMP ALL...
radiogirl 05/20/2009 11:54
The truth of the matter is..if information is felt to be needed if it became life or death, quite frankly, usually there is someone out there that will leak it. Not saying I agree with that but it's human nature. Maybe the person or family will speak out OR you'll see the signs as prevention and medical presence ramps up in that area. I'm a mom and heaven knows I'd throw myself in front of moving vehicles to protect my kids but you gotta think from the other angle too. The mom of the sick kid (just an example, no info here) wants to protect her young too from feeling like a leper.
The odds in my opinion, though none of us like to deal in odds, are probably in my favor even if I did come in contact. Maybe I'll come in contact with someone who isn't visibly ill or hasn't reported thinking they have a little cold or something. It's not a sure thing that I'm next. My immune system is still at work here. I figure I'll help it work by watching my habits all the time, not just now. Mind you, immunocompromised people should be more vigilant and absolutely should call their doctor with questions and concerns. Again, I'm no doctor. I'm a mom who happens to be in the medical field. Just sharing opinions.
And to reader...yea, you're probably right. Sometimes the "cures" aren't all they're cracked up to be. You do the whole risk vs. benefit thing, I think.
Seriously, talk to your doctor if you're worried. That's what they do. I only responded before because there were some odd posts that would scare the dickens out of people. Giving my view for what it's worth. All the best.
n 05/20/2009 01:13
I understand that we have to protect the rights of the patient. But what about the hundreds of people that have mostlikly came in contact with this patient? If the health department cant tell us you would think that this patient would speak up and say something so that no one else in the area gets sick and goes threw what they are!
ME 05/19/2009 23:30
Nurse too--people are dying from the med Tamiflu also.
reader 05/19/2009 21:14
No, "they" have a responsibility to the patient to protect health information. Whether you think that is right or wrong, your opinion may vary if you are the affected person/s or not. It is what it is...read HIPPA regulations and understand in the big picture, it is generally best though often arguable and remains a hot topic. Now that it is a confirmed case, you should read CDC, (NIH, WHO and Department of Health) guidelines on standard precautions for infectious diseases if even just to ease your mind. If you are here, then you are able to access information at those sites. There is no need for panic. Remember something...many of these scary "bugs" were here before and you went about your day just trying not to catch the colds that your coworkers and peers had. You washed your hands and you covered your mouth when you coughed. Same goes here. It often takes a specific pattern to start the testing and treatment which snowballs into communities, hence we learn of it and it scares the daylights out of us. Basically, the prevention is the same as all "flu" strains. Yes, many many more die annually from the flu strains more familiar to us. Most had some compromised immunity to begin with because of age or disability. And you can't blame the government on this. We haven't found cures to all the world ills. And yes, Laura, yesterday's article was indeed irresponsible reporting. Now there should be followup with standard precautions and guidelines printed directly from the CDC for those who cannot access online. Incidentally, the Department of Health gleans it's info from the CDC and reports based on regulatory standards. Tamiflu and antiviral/antibiotic treatment are largely useless unless active interaction and infection have occurred. To present a picture as one poster did..well, certainly it is appropriate to publish preventative measures and I certainly hope the media will in record time. However, calling out genocide and such is a bit much at this point. It is a scary world out there but hysteria and paranoia certainly won't help. Sure, I fear the next wave of illness such as the "Spanish" influenza of a century ago. Do I think this is it? If you asked me a few weeks ago, I would have had a tougher time answering but no, I don't think this is it (just an opinion). Use common sense first, get informed on precautions you should be using EVERY DAY not just now and don't set off panic at this stage of the game. Take action by prevention and don't wait for it to be handed to you. Look it up and pass it on.
Nurse too 05/19/2009 20:43
Correct me if I'm wrong but the Flu will eventually leave right?
Tom 05/19/2009 20:25
"a mass care resource limited environment" this would go for all aspects of treatment and care if resources become limited. I have been involved with the process for many years now on both the State and federal level, if the demand for the anti-viral and eventually the vaccine is overwhelmed by the supply there is a standard policy that those with the best chance for survival will be given priority, the techical term is battlefield triage.

My point is that the anti-viral is only effective if taken prior or in the beginning stages of H1N1, it is the CDC's guidelines that persons at high risk like the children, elderly, and those with chronic medical conditions take such ant-viral as a prophylactic to help prevent a full blow case of the flu, the CDC's criteria is that anyone who has been in an area with confirmed cases of H1N1 or direct contact with someone suspected of having H1N1 should begin such treatment. By the PDH not giving us the proper information a person that falls into this criteria does not have the neccessary information to protect ones self and determin that they should start treatment.

Rob 05/19/2009 20:15
We should be made aware of the age of the person, where he/she works or goes to school. You would think the CDC would have a responsibility to share this information, at least.
kim 05/19/2009 19:22
Rob, I believe the turning away part is only for respirators (if a need arises to place and there is not enough)not an anti -viral.
Pat 05/19/2009 18:04
Before the expected flood of posts come in decrying "irresponsible reporting", how about the posters look at the article again.

THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH is not revealing the name or location of the patient, meaning that The Times does not have the information. The point of the article is to remind people to be vigilant and "tak(e) precautions like washing hands, covering coughs and staying home from work or school when ill." It was not to name Lackawanna County's Patient Zero. It woudl have been irresponsible to NOT post this article now that H1N1 is a real threat in the community.

Thanks, Laura.

I now leave you to the usual whining........

Reader 05/19/2009 16:45
Way to promote prevention, just don't give the information about it. CDC protocol is for persons with chronic illnesses such as cancer, diabetes, kidney disease, auto immune deficiencies, who have been in an area of confirmed cases or in contact with those suspected of having confirmed cases to take a prophylactic regimen of an anti-viral such as tamiflu. How is this population going to follow the CDC recommendations if Lackawanna county officials and the PA department of Health will not give the necessary information for them to protect themselves?

In the larger picture it is the Governments response plan to treat the ones with the best chance of survival in a mass care resource limited environment. This means that those with the above chronic illnesses will be turned away for the ones with a better percentage of survival, now it is apparent they are taking away the next step of survival for persons with chronic illnesses, PREVENTION.

This use to called genocide, now is called the Pennsylvania health plan

ROB 05/19/2009 16:23

Coroner: Police report on crash doesn't explain why wreck went unnoticed

By Charles Schillinger A state police report on an accident that killed a Taylor man in February does not explain why troopers from the Pocono Barracks failed to find the wreck off the Northeast Extension of the Pennsylvania Turnpike for three days, Lac